MSNBC host says newborn infants don’t count as ‘alive’ unless parents decide they do; infanticide is the new abortion

abortionToday Natural News denounces Melissa Harris-Perry, the latest talking head “death worshipper” to publicly imply that she supports the murder of living, breathing newborn children. According to Harris-Perry, life begins when the parents feel like life begins. And together with some twisted new “ethics” arguments from the radical left, this can include months or years after a child is born.

That’s why I need to premise this article with a disclaimer: This article is not about abortion. It’s about the murder of children after they are born. Because once a child is born alive, terminating that life is no longer a “choice” … it’s murder by every legal and moral standard. Because while abortion friends and foes can argue about when life begins in the womb, no one disagrees that a child born alive is, well, ALIVE… do they?

Indeed, they do. MSNBC talking head Melissa Harris-Perry insists that life only begins when the parents have a “feeling” that it begins. “When does life begin? I submit the answer depends an awful lot on the feeling of the parents. A powerful feeling — but not science,” Harris-Perry said to nationwide astonishment on her July 21 MSNBC show.

And in one stroke, she simultaneously condones the murder of newborn infants (i.e. “post-birth abortion”) while attacking the science of biology which unambiguously states that a living, breathing infant with a heartbeat and brain function is alive, not dead.

But don’t tell that to the radical abortion whackos. Far beyond arguing for the “right” to abort a baby in the first or second trimester, many abortion advocates who run in the same circles as Melissa Harris-Perry are now publicly arguing that it is okay for parents to kill their children up to age three. This is now being promoted as a “post-birth abortion.”

It was also called a “fourth trimester abortion” by a clever pollster who recently took to the streets of George Mason University to find out if summertime college students would sign a petition legalizing fourth-trimester abortions. Nearly all who were asked to sign the petition did so! One of the college students even asked whether the procedure would “cause harm to the child.”

“Well the child wouldn’t be there anymore,” responded the pollster, after which the college student then proceeded to sign the petition.

 

And yes, this is how incredibly stupid many of today’s college students really are. Then again, I remember a guy back in college who walked in on a group of us watching a football game and asked, “How many quarters are there in a football game?” His lack of mathematical prowess would have made him a ripe target for the “fourth trimester abortion” gimmick, I’ll bet.

Murdering live babies under the label of “abortion”

Let’s be clear about where all this is headed. This is not about arguing over a woman’s right to have a first- or second-trimester abortion. This isn’t even a debate about a third-trimester abortion, the kind of abortion that was recently outlawed in Texas, much to the despair of late-term abortion advocates across the country, some of whom actually chanted “Hail Satan” in unison at the Austin abortion rally.

This is really about the zealous desire of the radical left to legalize the “aborting” of babies after they are born alive so that parents can have the legal right to kill living babies they suddenly decide they don’t want to raise.

Getting back to Harris-Perry, according to her radical brand of death culture ideology, a parent can “decide” that a baby born alive isn’t really alive yet. That parent can wait to see whether the baby is well-behaved, or cute, or has the right skin color, or whatever, before deciding whether to keep it or kill it. If such an ideology were fronted by someone like George Bush, it would be wildly derided as barbaric and anti-human, but because the idea of murdering newborn babies is being pushed by liberals, it is met with silence instead of outrage.

“When a pregnancy is wanted . . . It is easy to think of the bump as a baby,” says Melissa Harris-Perry, implying that when a pregnancy is not wanted, that bump isn’t a baby at all. Somehow it’s just a mass of dead tissue that you can dispose of at will. The fact that the “bump” results in a live childbirth is never admitted by people like Harris-Perry. The baby isn’t “alive” until you decide it is!

Recently, two black parents were shocked to find that the woman gave birth to a white baby. According to Melissa Harris-Perry, these two black parents can now “decide” their white baby isn’t alive at all and therefore commit infanticide that’s rephrased as a “post-birth abortion.”

This is the position embraced by the radical left: babies are not humans, and it is okay to murder them even up to age three.

Newborn babies have no “moral right to life”

A study published in the Journal of Medical Ethics argues that newborn babies have no “moral right to life,” and are thus not actually “persons.” Alberto Giubilini, from The University of Milan, and Francesca Minerva, a post-doctoral fellow at The University of Melbourne’s Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, are heroes of the radical left. They argue that infanticide should be legal but renamed “post-birth abortion.”

They insist that newborn babies have no right to life and that parents can simply “decide” to kill their children for all sorts of reasons, including feeling like the child will be too expensive to raise, or suddenly discovering the fact that newborn babies cry a lot.

“Rather than being actual persons, newborns were potential persons,” write the study authors. They don’t really count as human beings until the parents decide they do.

This appears to be the same argument being made by MSNBC’s Melissa Harris-Perry, who expressed extreme outrage over the murder of Trayvon Martin but seems to openly embrace the murder of countless black infants who are born alive and healthy but are “unwanted” by their parents. Life begins based “on the feeling of the parents,” she submits. So it’s utterly unscientific and subject to (liberal) interpretation, which in this case seems to favor infanticide and even eugenics. (By far most aborted babies in America are Black and Hispanic. If post-birth abortion is openly embraced, most of the murdered infants will also be Black and Hispanic.)

And so the violent contradiction of radical leftist ideology is exposed in the raw: Liberals claim to support “equality” but then they consider living babies to be “non-persons.” Liberals claim to support racial minorities, yet they endorse and even encourage the murder of the young babies of their own minority race. Liberals claim that all life is sacred, but their glaring exception is the life of a newborn child, which should be the most sacred of all but is instead considered worthless.

When it comes to taking a life, pro-abortion liberals are all for it. But when it comes to defending your life with a legal firearm, liberals are aggressively opposed to it.

So let me get this straight: Murder is okay but self defense is evil?

Or better yet, if Trayvon Martin had been an “unwanted” newborn just six months old, would his murder have been celebrated by the left instead of mourned? Help me figure this out, please, because I’m trying to understand at what age, exactly, the murder of a young black baby invokes racially-charged marches across the nation vs. receiving applause from people like Melissa Harris-Perry. Apparently if Trayvon Martin had been murdered by his own parents 16 years earlier, that would have been perfectly acceptable to these people.

Melissa Harris-Perry is a modern-day holocaust denier

At the risk of being accused of making sense, let me state the obvious here: People like Melissa Harris-Perry are the new holocaust deniers. They are anti-human agenda pushers who literally inspire others to murder their own children.

I don’t know about you, but I cannot accept, as a spiritual human being and a responsible member of society, the legalization of the murder of babies who are born alive and breathing. Yet that is precisely what the radical left is pushing for: the “right” to murder their own children up to the age of three. (Oh yeah, they’re also pushing for the “right” to kill elderly people, but that’s another article altogether.)

Such an agenda is despicable, if not downright demonic. And the fact that people like Harris-Perry spew this death cult violence on MSNBC — the propaganda branch of the White house — only further proves that MSNBC has lost all credibility and is now being run as a Hitler-style holocaust support network that tolerates hosts who effectively endorse the mass murder of babies all across America.

There is evil in this nation, and wicked women like Harris-Perry are steeped in it. Mainstream media networks like MSNBC thrive on it, and the destructive forces that currently occupy the White House gain power from it. Everywhere you turn, there are efforts under way to sow racial hatred, murder innocent babies, poison the food supply, chemically lobotomize children with vaccines and enslave the masses medically and economically.

I hereby denounce this wickedness, on the record, as a statement of principle for the world to witness. I will forever oppose these merchants of death and their sick, demented eugenics schemes. I will fight to protect the lives of the innocent for as long as I am alive, even if those innocent lives include two-day-old black babies who have just been brought into this world through the miracle of gestation and childbirth.

I call for all Natural News readers and supporters to take steps each and every day to resist evil and overcome the forces of death and destruction that now dominate our society through witch-hearted minions like Melissa Harris-Perry, a traitor to humanity and an endorser of the murder of children.

This woman should be immediately blackballed by the entire media and yanked off the air to return to her own little world of tampon earrings and dead newborns. Or maybe she will murder her own baby in the near future and feature it on the set of MSNBC in a special celebration broadcast complete with pentagrams etched on the desk and a chorus of hooded Satan worshippers drinking the blood of the dead fetus while Melissa Harris-Perry reads the names of sponsors. Sadly, it would probably get record ratings and be heralded by the death culture media as “pioneering television.” And it would most certainly be cheered by the radical left as a “choice.”

Learn more: 

7 thoughts on “MSNBC host says newborn infants don’t count as ‘alive’ unless parents decide they do; infanticide is the new abortion

  1. I believe that you have seriously distorted Ms. Harris-Perry’s opinion on abortion and abortion laws. Minimizing abortions is an admirable goal, but to do it by oppressive laws, against prospective mothers who may have good reasons for deciding to abort a pregnancy, shows a lack of sensitivity and absence of respect for human life. While casual abortions are not an ideal, the fact is that few abortions are done casually. Enforced mandatory full-term pregnancy is not a good solution either to a problematic situation; it is tantamount to gestational enslavement. Since you seem to be advocating enslavement of others, do you likewise approve of it for yourself? You claim that your article is not about abortion, but then you immediately contradict that when you equate abortion with your so-called “post-birth abortion”. I listened to Ms. Harris-Perry’s broadcast which you have maligned. I wasn’t listening closely (since I had other work before me), and I did find it challenging to understand exactly what portions of her editorial were specifically stating. Nonetheless, I heard and understood enough to be convinced that you have so deliberately and maliciously distorted her message, and you have done so in such a preposterous and slanderous manner, such that it is my belief that you should be criminally prosecuted for fraud and deceit which you perpetrate on the public at large. Freedom of speech and thought are among my most cherished ideals, but that does not give anyone the legal right to commit deceit or fraud so as to harm another, financially or otherwise. You are so full of yourself and so cocksure that you have all the moral high ground that you recklessly and irresponsibly demean Ms. Harris-Perry, and you completely distort the message conveyed in her commentary. While criminal prosecution for your abuse of Free Speech may be unlikely and unreachable, there is absolutely no question that you should be sued for violations under Civil Laws. Your careless and unwarranted usage of “radical left” and anything pertaining to your imagined shortcomings of “liberals” is on the one hand (right or left is inconsequential) comedic and riotously funny; but on the other hand, when viewed from standards of truthfulness, honesty and fair play, shows what a wretched little mind you dare to parade in public like some authority on morality, political correctness, and social ideals. We can find some agreement on the disagreeable aspects of infanticide and abortion on a whim. But when you propose oppressive measures to eliminate oppression, you tend to mire yourself in what you allege to detest. I am really fed up with arguments which hinge on “right” this and “left” that, which in the moral, social and political continuum are lacking in any realistic contextual relationship with historical realities, and which are not of any worthwhile value towards uplifting the human condition. The expressions “right” and “left” are twisted abuses of reasoning that deserve to be soundly criticized and castigated whenever anyone dares to use them in support of any serious discussions. For you to lump any group of people into one of your (not so) neat and tidy stereotypical generalizations which do not even hint at truth, all goes to expose your shallowness and your insincerity, qualities which apparently are yet hidden from your own consciousness. On a personal level, one to one, you may seem to be very friendly and agreeable, and maybe in fact you are someone I would be fortunate to have as a true friend and with whom I would freely and voluntarily spend time, publicly or in private. But your injudicious attacks on people who hold different opinions make you appear to be scary and borderline lunatic. If you seriously care about infanticide or humanity at large, I recommend that you engage in some deep, deep introspection, with honest self-examination of your basic values, and of your projected methodologies for conveying those values through your outward manifestations of how you interact with others. Just as important, if not more so, is how you interact with yourself and your hidden emotions and the thoughts which those emotions generate. They flit in and out of the view of your conscious mind, and have a greater impact on you than you may be aware. Last of all, I suggest that you review Ms. Harris-Perry’s commentary with your mouth shut and your mind open, for the purpose of investigating whether you may have misinterpreted or misheard her message. And don’t expect her, or yourself, to be the repository fount of all truth and wisdom. Being human means being fallible. Let God do His thing. Don’t presume to speak for Him, or act on His behalf. Accept what inspiration comes to you with humility, grace and gratitude, and make love your beacon and your reason for living. Love without tolerance is a misnomer and a vile misrepresentation. Set it right. One’s life course must be re-charted and realigned from time to time. Good luck crafting your apology to Ms. Harris-Perry, if you should happen to be wise enough to contemplate the task. Leave spiritual perfection to God. Let yourself and others be humans working together to improve our collective lot. Please. Nothing I have written herein was intended to be hurtful to you. But I hope that it gives you the insight, courage and will to alter your thinking for the better — not once, not twice, but over and over again in a joyous process of spiritual seeking.

    • i think we should call a spade a spade an not pussy foot about because we like some one abortion is murder this womans choice of words and such show her cruel and callous nature she is a disgrace a selfish individual with no idea of love as you put it. liberal ideal’s are a scam for the real agenda which is wickedness in high places.

    • “Minimizing abortions is an admirable goal, but to do it by oppressive laws, against prospective mothers who may have good reasons for deciding to abort a pregnancy, shows a lack of sensitivity and absence of respect for human life.” — And I would contend that a human being robbing another human of their inalienable right to live, shows an even greater lack of sensitivity and absence of respect for human life. Especially when the life being taken has no personal advocate on their behalf. Is that not the ultimate oppression? How is it pro-lifers are “playing God” by attempting to BE that advocate, but pro-abortionists defending the right to end life are not? I would concede that Harris-Perry’s position is more consistent with how all pro-abortionists should view the issue. Whether you abort the life of a person 6 months before it is born or wait until it is 6 months out of the womb, it is still a life, and _someone else_ is choosing to end it. As for not intending to be hurtful to the author, I believe you to be a liar. You might try some “deep, deep, introspection” as well, to be certain you are not lying to yourself as well.

      • i think you are right they are admitting that all abortion is murder and they support it that the lifestyle of a mother is more important than an actual life.
        People who support abortion mostly have never thought this out but the people on the news are so bad they know exactly what is going on. These are the people who have been saying things like mercury in vaccines is good for you, they are callous uncaring and in many cases sociopaths, At least glen Beck who took 50 million Dollars to tell half truths is conflicted”we see this in his stress levels and health” which is why he is so convincing he does care but he sold out and is conflicted about it. We have to realize the people who read the news are mostly evil wicked people. They may not have started out that way but the only the worst most callous and best liars are allowed to read the news, there are one or two exceptions”they have to do this to be at least half credible” but in the main the tv pundits are mostly despicable degenerates only interested in how much money they can make and their c arrears, the lady in question is in the despicable category. LET US NOT FORGET THIS IS THE SAME PERSON WHO SAID YOUR CHILDREN DO NOT BELONG TO YOU BUT TO THE COMMUNITY AKA THE STATE. SHE IS A HARDCORE COMMUNIST SUBVERSIVE, masquerading as a conservative or whatever she says she is. THIS WOMAN IS DANGEROUS.

  2. Pingback: End Times Prophecy Headlines: July 29, 2013 | End Times Prophecy Report

  3. Pingback: HEADLINES TODAY

Comments are closed.